ESL Dialogues - A Couple of Opinions on our Profession
I think in a way it is a shame that in the EFL/ESL teaching profession we do not
have more respect for the experience of teachers.
Our impressions do matter. Just because they are not a scientific
study is beside the point. A teacher with many years of experience, does have something to teach us, and does have valuable knowledge to share.
I really despise the style of academic writing where we are forced to quote Nunan, Richards, McDonough et al to back up what
we know to be true from our own experience, - in order to be published in peer reviewed journals.
I suppose you can simply label me as a rebel who just does not
want to play that game. But do me the courtesy of hearing me out.
Teaching English is not a science though I do agree that it can
be studied scientifically to some extent. I am not saying that
the studies done by the above people and others are not valuable. They are.
What I am saying is that the experience of veteran teachers too
is of great value, and should be widely disseminated. We don`t have to try to emulate science to gain more respect.
publish someone who has gained their opinion over a particular
aspect of teaching - from observing it over twenty years?
We are professionals and we have self-respect. I don`t need the respect of naive people who do not understand fully what it takes to be an English as a second language/foreign language teacher. We do not need to impress the chemists of the world.
We just need to teach as well as we can, and help new teachers to be the best that they can be. That`s it!
The all-star, veteran teachers of each institution have a wide
knowledge to share, and they should be encouraged to share it with new teachers in every way possible.
While this knowledge cannot be published as fact, and is not
based upon a scientific study, it should be published and shared;
as it is a wealth of information, a wealth of WISDOM I will
Of course, keep up the scientific studies on relative topics in
ESL/EFL. But let`s not try to emulate chemistry, or physics.
We don`t need to and some of the terminology that is coming out
is frankly embarrassing.
ESL Dialogues - What is with the Jargon we are now forced to use in our profession?
Whose bright idea was it to start using that?
Are we trying to be scientists now? Who are we trying to impress?
EXTENSIVE READING - what the heck is that? Oh you mean have
the students read a lot. Okay now I get it.
Do we have to come up with all of this pedantic, self-indulgent
terminology for some of the things we do? Why?
Why not just say it simply:
"I think it is important that students read many books."
There, well said and you understand me right?
Do we really need terminology like:
EXTENSIVE READING ?
Teaching English is a social act not a scientific one. It is
closer to psychology than it is to chemistry. And frankly
"scientific studies," of less than 100 subjects are not very convincing.
If you are not proud of what you do, then I feel sorry for you.
Being an EFL/ESL teacher is a very valuable thing to do. You do not have to justify it to anyone. Be proud!
Those who can,....TEACH!
Would you like to Stay in a Wild West Cottage near Hakone?
But still have money left over for a nice dinner!
To Grammar Questions
To the Machidanian
To ESL Speaking
To Teach English in Japan - TESOL
From ESL Dialogues to ESL Conversation
From ESL Dialogues to How to teach English in Japan (home)